Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:47:54.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between serum urea levels and dietary nitrogen utilization in young men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

Yvonne S. M. Taylor ,
N. S. Scrimshaw  and
V. R. Young
Yvonne S. M. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
N. S. Scrimshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
V. R. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Results from metabolic balance studies in young adult men were examined for the relationships between the concentration of serum urea (SUN) and the efficiency of dietary nitrogen utilization. A total of 231 separate balance periods were included in the analysis. Net protein utilization (NPU) was used as an index of dietary protein quality.

2. Protein intake ranged from 0·27–0·73 g/kg body-weight per d in the various experiments. There was a highly significant negative correlation between NPU and urea levels. The relationship was: NPU = 1·23–0·029 × SUN (mmol/l) (r = −0·89).

3. These results are considered in relation to the evaluation of protein quality in adult humans.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , September 1974 , pp. 407 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1974

References

REFERENCES

Addis, T., Barrett, E., Poo, L. J. & Yuen, D. W. (1947). J. clin. Invest. 26, 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arroyave, G. (1961). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 20, 39.Google Scholar
Eggum, B. O. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggum, B. O. (1973). In Proteins in Human Nutrition p. 317 [Porter, J. W. G. and Rolls, B. A., editors’. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kies, C. & Fox, H. M. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. & Fleck, A. (1969). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism Vol. 3, p. 435 [Munro, H. N., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scrimshaw, N. S., Hussein, M. A., Murray, E., Rand, W. M. & Young, V. R. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrimshaw, N. S., Taylor, Y. S. M. & Young, V. R. (1973). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 26, 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Y. S. M., Young, V. R., Murray, E., Pencharz, P. B. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1973). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 26, 1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technicon Instruments Corporation (1967). Technicon AutoAnalyzer Methodology Publication N-1c. Tarrytown, New York: Technicon Instruments Corporation.Google Scholar
Young, V. R., & Özalp, I., Cholakos, B. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R., Hussein, M. A., Murray, E. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R., Taylor, Y. S. M., Rand, W. M. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1973). J. Nutr. 103, 1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar