Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:29:07.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychosis and the Dissonance in the Doctor-Patient Relationship; a Thematic Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Aimee Lawton*
Affiliation:
The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Within psychiatry, relationships between doctors and patients with psychosis are significant determinants of attitudes, adherence, and therapeutic outcomes. Current research focuses on communication within psychiatrist-patient interactions with limited evaluation of the patient's perspective. Understanding the components underpinning the patient's relationship with their doctor could help improve outcomes for individuals with psychosis.

Methods

Eight participants, recruited through advocacy programmes, were interviewed. All had a diagnosis of psychosis or its subtypes. Interviews lasted between forty and eighty minutes. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews allowed exploration of important themes within doctor-patient relationships. Ethical procedures were implemented in accordance with British Psychological Society guidelines.

Results

Participants’ narratives identified three salient themes perceived to influence doctor-patient relationships. Participants explored ‘Interactions with Medical Professionals’, focusing on communication and discussion styles. Doctors were not perceived as empathic, open listeners, reducing trust and limiting conversation during interactions. Participants described reduced engagement due to perceived misunderstanding and highlighted the impact of time constraints, guidelines, and limited medical training on relationships.

Secondly, participants discussed the ‘Diagnostic Process’, suggesting it had a negative influence on the relationship due to delivery methods.

Finally, participants explored ‘Treatment’, highlighting an overwhelming reliance on medication, lack of explanations, and lack of psychological therapies, which contradicted with patients’ preferences.

Conclusion

The narratives describe a relationship in which patients feel misunderstood, furthering patient disengagement and resulting in a vicious cycle of dissonance that limits health outcomes. Findings suggest a need to incorporate psychological therapies into doctor-patient interactions to allow increased communication and understanding.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.