Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:05:05.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral cues from ordinary behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2018

Suraiya Allidina  and
William A. Cunningham
Suraiya Allidina
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada. [email protected]@psych.utoronto.cahttp://socialneuro.psych.utoronto.ca
William A. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada. [email protected]@psych.utoronto.cahttp://socialneuro.psych.utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

People want to form impressions of others based on their moral behaviours, but the most diagnostic behaviours are rarely seen. Therefore, societies develop symbolic forms of moral behaviour such as conventional rituals and games, which are used to predict how others are likely to act in more serious moral situations. This framework helps explain why everyday behaviours are often moralized.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C. & Bekoff, M. (2005) Animal play and the evolution of morality: An ethological approach. Topoi 24(2):125–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-005-5050-8.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M. (2001) Social play behaviour: Cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(2):81–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1309460.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2004) Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 133(4):55–66.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2007) The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The Innate Mind 3:367–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2009) The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior 30(4):244–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J. & Skitka, L. J. (2014) Morality in everyday life. Science 345(6202):1340–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560.Google Scholar
Marsh, A. A., Stoycos, S. A., Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Robinson, P., VanMeter, J. W. & Cardinale, E. M. (2014) Neural and cognitive characteristics of extraordinary altruists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111(42):15036–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408440111.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H. (2007) Play, games, and the development of collective intentionality. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2007(115):53–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H. & Tomasello, M. (2007) The ontogeny of social ontology: Steps to shared intentionality and status functions. In: Intentional acts and institutional facts, ed. Tsohatzidis, S. L., pp. 113–37. Springer.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. J. (2012) The essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms. Psychological Bulletin 138(3):529–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A. & Diermeier, D. (2015) A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(1):72–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556679.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J. & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) The importance of moral construal: Moral versus non-moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48693. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048693.Google Scholar
Watanabe, J. M. & Smuts, B. B. (1999) Explaining religion without explaining it away: Trust, truth, and the evolution of cooperation in Roy A. Rappaport's “The Obvious Aspects of Ritual.” American Anthropologist 101(1):98–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.1.98.Google Scholar