Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:16:47.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural differentiation does not entail group-level structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Robert Malcolm Ross  and
Quentin Douglas Atkinson
Robert Malcolm Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surry TW20 0EX, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.ccd.edu.au/people/profile.php?memberID=595 ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, and Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Quentin Douglas Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. [email protected]://www.fos.auckland.ac.nz/~quentinatkinson/Quentin_Atkinsons_Website/Home.html Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Richerson et al. argue that relatively large cultural FST values provide evidence for group structure and therefore scope for group selection. However, recent research on spatial patterns of cultural variation demonstrates that, as in the genetic case, apparent group structure can be a consequence of geographic clines, not group barriers. Such a pattern limits the scope for cultural group selection.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e49
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, A. V., Richerson, P. J. & McElreath, R. (2009) Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106(42):17671–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903232106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S., Savage, P. E., Ko, A. M., Stoneking, M., Ko, Y. C., Loo, J. H. & Trejaut, J. A. (2014) Correlations in the population structure of music, genes and language. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1774):e20132072. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2072.Google ScholarPubMed
Handley, L. J. L., Manica, A., Goudet, J. & Balloux, F. (2007) Going the distance: Human population genetics in a clinal world. Trends in Genetics 23(9):432–39. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsinger, K. E. & Weir, B. S. (2009) Genetics in geographically structured populations: Defining, estimating and interpreting FST . Nature Reviews Genetics 10(9):639–50. doi: 10.1038/nrg2611.Google Scholar
Jobling, M. A. (2012) The impact of recent events on human genetic diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1590):793–99. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lao, O., Lu, T. T., Nothnagel, M., Junge, O., Freitag-Wolf, S., Caliebe, A., Balascakova, M., Bertranpetit, J., Bindoff, L. A., Comas, D., Holmlund, G., Kouvatsi, A., Macek, M., Mollet, I., Parson, W., Palo, J., Ploski, R., Sajantila, A., Tagliabracci, A., Gether, U., Werge, T., Rivadeneira, F., Hofman, A., Uitterlinden, A. G., Gieger, C., Wichmann, H. E., Rüther, A., Schreiber, S., Becker, C., Nümberg, P., Nelson, M. R., Krawczak, M. & Kayser, M. (2008) Correlation between genetic and geographic structure in Europe. Current Biology 18(16):1241–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novembre, J., Johnson, T., Bryc, K., Kutalik, Z., Boyko, A. R., Auton, A., Indap, A., King, K. S., Bergmann, S., Nelson, M. R., Stephens, M. & Bustamante, C. D. (2008) Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature 456(7218):98–101. doi: 10.1038/nature07331.Google Scholar
Ross, R. M., Greenhill, S. J. & Atkinson, Q. D. (2013) Population structure and cultural geography of a folktale in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1756):20123065. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.3065.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. J., Crema, E. R. & Kerig, T. (2015) Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and “core” vs. “package” cultural evolution models in Neolithic Europe. Evolution and Human Behavior 36(2):103–19. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.006.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. E. (2014) The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37(3):243–95. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001544.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed