Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:31:43.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to neo-Darwinism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

A. J. Wells
A. J. Wells
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lifelines discusses two approaches to biology, “ultra-Darwinism” which Rose criticises, and the “homeodynamic perspective,” which he offers as an alternative. This review suggests that ultra-Darwinism is a caricature of the theoretical positions Rose wishes to oppose and that the homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative, but is complementary to so-called ultra-Darwinism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 911 - 912
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)