Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:55:16.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to de Borhegyi's Review of Los Mayas Eternos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rafael Girard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some archaeologists make a partial or total confusion of Quiché and Maya culture and history during the Classic period. The historic developments of these two peoples are completely different. Borhegyi's criticism reveals the contradiction that may arise from this confusion. His review is primarily concerned with three paragraphs of my book and is refuted by citation of pertinent archaeological data.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , April 1964 , pp. 522
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Borhegyi, Stephan F. 1963 Review: Los Mayas Eternos, by Rafael Giiard. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 410–11. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Rafael 1962 Los hlayas Eternos. Editores Libro Mex, Mexico.Google Scholar
Lothrop, Samuel K. 1936 Zacualpa: A Study of Ancient Quiche Artifacts. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, No. 472. Washington.Google Scholar
Spinden, Herbert J. 1956 Los Toltecas en Guatemala. Anales de la Sociedad de Geografia e Historia de Guatemala, Vol. 29, Nos. 1-4, pp. 18–23. Guatemala.Google Scholar