Book contents
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- Troilus and Cressida
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Abbreviations and Conventions
- Introduction
- Note on the Text
- Troilus and Cressida
- Textual Analysis
- Appendix: Sources of the Play
- Reading List
- References
Reading List
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 August 2019
Book contents
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- Troilus and Cressida
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Abbreviations and Conventions
- Introduction
- Note on the Text
- Troilus and Cressida
- Textual Analysis
- Appendix: Sources of the Play
- Reading List
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Troilus and Cressida , pp. 276 - 277Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Reading List
Adams, Howard C. ‘What Cressid is’, in Sexuality and Politics in Renaissance Drama, ed. Levin, Carole and Robertson, Karen, 1991, pp. 75–93Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, ‘Hamlet’ to ‘The Tempest’, 1992Google Scholar
Beale, Simon Russell. ‘Thersites in Troilus and Cressida’, in Players of Shakespeare 3: Further Essays in Shakespearean Performance, ed. Jackson, Russell and Smallwood, Robert, 1993, pp. 160–73Google Scholar
Bowen, Barbara E. Gender in the Theatre of War: Shakespeare’s ‘Troilus and Cressida’, 1993Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda. ‘The two party system in Troilus and Cressida’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume iv: The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 2006, pp. 302–15Google Scholar
Dryden, John. Troilus and Cressida, ed. Novak, Maximillian and Guffey, George, in The Works of John Dryden (California Edition, 20 vols., 1956–94), vol. xiii, 1984Google Scholar
Elton, William R. Shakespeare’s ‘Troilus and Cressida’ and the Inns of Court Revels, 2000Google Scholar
Freund, Elizabeth. ‘“Ariachne’s broken woof”: the rhetoric of citation in Troilus and Cressida’, in Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, ed. Parker, Patricia and Hartman, Geoffrey, 1985, pp. 19–36Google Scholar
Girard, René. ‘The politics of desire in Troilus and Cressida’, in Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, ed. Parker, Patricia and Hartman, Geoffrey, 1985, pp. 188–209Google Scholar
Godschalk, William. ‘The texts of Troilus and Cressida’, Early Modern Literary Studies 1 (1995), 1–54Google Scholar
Greene, Gayle. ‘Shakespeare’s Cressida: “a kind of self”’, in The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, ed. Lenz, Carolyn, Swift, Ruth, Greene, Gayle, and Neely, Carol Thomas, 1980, pp. 133–49Google Scholar
Hillman, David. Shakespeare’s Entrails: Belief, Scepticism, and the Interior of the Body, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. ‘He do Cressida in different voices’, English Literary Renaissance 20 (1990), 254–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J. ‘The date and revision of Troilus and Cressida’, in Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation, ed. McGann, J., 1985, pp. 38–54Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J. Myriad-Minded Shakespeare: Essays, Chiefly on the Tragedies and Problem Comedies, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Heather. Shakespeare’s Troy: Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Dennis. Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-century Performance, 1993Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. ‘“Opinion” in Troilus and Cressida’, in Teaching the Text, ed. Kappeler, Susanne and Bryson, Norman, 1983, pp. 164–79Google Scholar
Lancashire, Ian. ‘Probing Shakespeare’s idiolect in Troilus and Cressida’, University of Toronto Quarterly 68 (1999), 728–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallin, Eric S. Inscribing the Time: Shakespeare and the End of Elizabethan England, 1995Google Scholar
Minton, Gretchen E. ‘“Discharging less than the tenth part of one”: performance anxiety and/in Troilus and Cressida’, in Shakespeare and the Cultures of Performance, ed. Yachnin, Paul and Badir, Patricia, 2008, pp. 101–19Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. ‘Rhetoric, ideology, and the Elizabethan world picture’, in Renaissance Rhetoric, ed. Mack, Peter, 1994, pp. 140–64Google Scholar
Rizvi, Pervez. ‘The bibliographical relationship between the texts of Troilus and Cressida’, Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 14:3 (2013), 271–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Kiernan. ‘Troilus and Cressida: the perils of presentism’, in Presentist Shakespeares, ed. Grady, Hugh and Hawkes, Terence, 2007, pp. 164–83Google Scholar
Sinfield, Alan. ‘The leather men and the lovely boy: reading positions in Troilus and Cressida’, in Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare, ed. Menon, Madhavi, 2011, pp. 376–84Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. ‘Troilus and Cressida: bibliography, performance and interpretation’, Shakespeare Studies 15 (1982), 99–136Google Scholar
Tylee, Claire M. ‘The text of Cressida and every ticklish reader: Troilus and Cressida, the Greek camp scene’, S.Sur. 41 (1989), 63–76Google Scholar
Williams, Philip. ‘Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida: the relationship of quarto and folio’, Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950), 131–43Google Scholar
Williams, Philip. ‘The “second issue” of Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, 1609’, Studies in Bibliography 2 (1949), 25–33Google Scholar