Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Glossary
- 1 Recent progress in interpreting the nature of the near-Earth object population
- 2 Earth impactors: orbital characteristics and warning times
- 3 The role of radar in predicting and preventing asteroid and comet collisions with Earth
- 4 Interior structures for asteroids and cometary nuclei
- 5 What we know and don't know about surfaces of potentially hazardous small bodies
- 6 About deflecting asteroids and comets
- 7 Scientific requirements for understanding the near-Earth asteroid population
- 8 Physical properties of comets and asteroids inferred from fireball observations
- 9 Mitigation technologies and their requirements
- 10 Peering inside near-Earth objects with radio tomography
- 11 Seismological investigation of asteroid and comet interiors
- 12 Lander and penetrator science for near-Earth object mitigation studies
- 13 Optimal interception and deflection of Earth-approaching asteroids using low-thrust electric propulsion
- 14 Close proximity operations at small bodies: orbiting, hovering, and hopping
- 15 Mission operations in low-gravity regolith and dust
- 16 Impacts and the public: communicating the nature of the impact hazard
- 17 Towards a national program to remove the threat of hazardous NEOs
- Index
7 - Scientific requirements for understanding the near-Earth asteroid population
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Glossary
- 1 Recent progress in interpreting the nature of the near-Earth object population
- 2 Earth impactors: orbital characteristics and warning times
- 3 The role of radar in predicting and preventing asteroid and comet collisions with Earth
- 4 Interior structures for asteroids and cometary nuclei
- 5 What we know and don't know about surfaces of potentially hazardous small bodies
- 6 About deflecting asteroids and comets
- 7 Scientific requirements for understanding the near-Earth asteroid population
- 8 Physical properties of comets and asteroids inferred from fireball observations
- 9 Mitigation technologies and their requirements
- 10 Peering inside near-Earth objects with radio tomography
- 11 Seismological investigation of asteroid and comet interiors
- 12 Lander and penetrator science for near-Earth object mitigation studies
- 13 Optimal interception and deflection of Earth-approaching asteroids using low-thrust electric propulsion
- 14 Close proximity operations at small bodies: orbiting, hovering, and hopping
- 15 Mission operations in low-gravity regolith and dust
- 16 Impacts and the public: communicating the nature of the impact hazard
- 17 Towards a national program to remove the threat of hazardous NEOs
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The known NEA population contains a confusing variety of objects: there are many different “animals in the zoo” of near-Earth asteroids. Some NEAs are thought to be largely metallic, indicative of material of high density and strength, while some others are carbonaceous and probably of lower density and less robust. A number of NEAs may be evolved cometary nuclei that are presumably porous and of low density but otherwise with essentially unknown physical characteristics. In terms of large-scale structure NEAs range from monolithic slabs to “rubble piles” and binary systems (asteroids with natural satellites or moons). An asteroid that has been shattered by collisions with other objects may survive under the collective weak gravitational attraction of the resulting fragments as a cohesionless, consolidated, so-called rubble pile. A rubble pile may become a binary system if it makes a close approach to a planet and becomes partially disrupted by the gravitational perturbation. More than 20 NEAs in the currently known population are thought to be binary systems and many more are probably awaiting discovery.
The rate of discovery of NEAs has increased dramatically in recent years and is now seriously outstripping the rate at which the population can be physically characterized. The NEA population is still largely unexplored.
Which physical parameters are most relevant for mitigation considerations? Preventing a collision with an NEA on course for the Earth would require total destruction of the object, to the extent that the resulting debris poses no hazard to the Earth or, perhaps more realistically, deflecting it slightly from its catastrophic course.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids , pp. 141 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
- 1
- Cited by