Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Photographs
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: The ‘Native’ Diplomat
- 2 Shirtless Srinivasan
- 3 A Worthy Successor to Gokhale
- 4 The Silver-Tongued Orator
- 5 The Most Picturesque Figure
- 6 A Rather Dangerous Ambassador
- 7 Like the Anger of Rudra
- 8 An Honourable Compromise
- 9 A Trustee of India’s Honour
- 10 We Have No Sastri
- 11 Conclusion: An Amiable Usurper
- Appendix A The 1921 Imperial Conference Resolution
- Appendix B The Cape Town Agreement of 1927
- List of Archives
- List of Illustration Sources and Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Index
11 - Conclusion: An Amiable Usurper
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2021
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Photographs
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: The ‘Native’ Diplomat
- 2 Shirtless Srinivasan
- 3 A Worthy Successor to Gokhale
- 4 The Silver-Tongued Orator
- 5 The Most Picturesque Figure
- 6 A Rather Dangerous Ambassador
- 7 Like the Anger of Rudra
- 8 An Honourable Compromise
- 9 A Trustee of India’s Honour
- 10 We Have No Sastri
- 11 Conclusion: An Amiable Usurper
- Appendix A The 1921 Imperial Conference Resolution
- Appendix B The Cape Town Agreement of 1927
- List of Archives
- List of Illustration Sources and Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Index
Summary
The business of a biographer is, C.L.R. James reminds us, to keep in mind that ‘great men [and women] make history, but only such history as it is possible for them to make’. A biographer's task is ‘to portray the limits of those necessities and the realization, complete or partial, of all possibilities’. A biographer in essence is almost always a historian of the limits on the individual.
Our narrative of Sastri's diplomatic life ends here, but before we turn to conclude with the key themes, we have the small matter of 17 years to talk about. Our narrative ends in January 1929 and Sastri lived until April 1946. It is only fair that we at least offer a synoptic view of the rest of his life.
Sastri returned from South Africa to be taken off to East Africa by Irwin in May 1929. The Commission on Closer Union of the East African Commission, also known as the Hilton Young Commission, had recently submitted its report to the British government. The majority report rejected the demand for a more federated and selfgoverning polity that the whites had demanded. A federal union, along the lines of South Africa, would have given them greater political distance from London and more autonomy to form a white supremacist state. The report took a more pro-African and pro-Indian stance, recommending a common franchise and common electoral roll for all races, with a rider that the consent of whites must be requisitioned before a common roll was adopted. It recommended a closer union between the three territories of Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika but only for the purposes of coordinating native policy. However, Leo Amery, the Secretary of State for Colonies, unabashedly sympathetic to the interests of Kenyan whites, discarded the recommendations of this commission and as compensation sent a permanent under-secretary, Samuel Wilson, to ascertain local reactions.
To minimize the damage of Amery's actions for Indians in East Africa, Irwin proposed to send Sastri to help/assist with their case. Amery conditioned that Sastri would not raise the issue of the common roll. Sastri refused to go with his hands tied behind his back. Very reluctantly, Amery relented.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- India's First DiplomatV. S. Srinivasa Sastri and the Making of Liberal Internationalism, pp. 217 - 234Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2021