Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Locating the Discussion
- 2 Division, Democracy and Deliberation
- 3 Deliberating National Identity and Citizenship
- 4 The Requirement of Reciprocity
- 5 The Requirement of Publicity
- 6 Dilemmas of Exclusion
- 7 Civil Society and Political Institutions
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - Deliberating National Identity and Citizenship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Locating the Discussion
- 2 Division, Democracy and Deliberation
- 3 Deliberating National Identity and Citizenship
- 4 The Requirement of Reciprocity
- 5 The Requirement of Publicity
- 6 Dilemmas of Exclusion
- 7 Civil Society and Political Institutions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The last chapter began by discussing John Stuart Mill's claim that a democratic state will not succeed unless its citizens share a common national identity. This chapter seeks to expand upon that discussion by examining two main forms that national identity might conceivably take. The first of these forms stresses civic institutions, public offices, agencies and officials, as well as common and authoritative rules that typically apply across the territory of a given state. By contrast, the second of these forms stresses the importance of ethnicity and culture, ancestral memories and struggles, and common fears and hopes for the future. These two forms should not be thought of as mutually exclusive, since in practice they will often overlap. Nevertheless, to the extent that a democratic society really does aspire to treat all of its citizens equally, irrespective of their more particular differences and divisions, I will argue that the creation of an overarching civic nationality should be one of its principal goals.
The chapter will then consider how an overarching civic nationality might best be facilitated in a divided society. To this end, I start by considering two (admittedly stylised) normative models of the democratic state, liberalism and republicanism. As I will portray it, liberalism holds that the institutions of the democratic state should aim to ensure that citizens have access to the same range of rights, resources and opportunities, so that they are equally free to pursue their particular interests as they see fit. Otherwise put, those institutions should be neutral with respect to questions of ethnicity.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Deliberative Democracy and Divided Societies , pp. 54 - 76Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2006