Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:01:45.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26B - Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology

Against

from Section IV - Embryology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

Roy Homburg
Affiliation:
Homerton University Hospital, London
Adam H. Balen
Affiliation:
Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine
Robert F. Casper
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto
Get access

Summary

An evaluation of published data from studies using incubators incorporating time-lapse imaging (TLI) in Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) reveals none that are sufficiently robust to justify its routine use. Data were evaluated for evidence that the use of TLI incubators results in improved treatment outcomes, whether through theoretically improved culture conditions (resulting from uninterrupted culture) or through theoretically improved embryo selection (resulting from the use of algorithms developed from analysis of time-lapse images of developing embryos), compared with using conventional incubation and conventional embryo selection methods. No such evidence is currently available.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, S, Bhide, P, Jordan, V, Pacey, A, Marjoribanks, J, Farquhar, C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; Issue 5. Art. No.: CD011320. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribenszky, C, Nilselid, A-M, Montag, M Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed. Online 2017;35:511–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×