Book contents
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Series page
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Limits for IVF
- Section II IVF Add-ons
- Section III The Best Policy
- Section IV Embryology
- 24A ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 24B ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 25A Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 25B Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 26A Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 26B Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 27A Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 27B Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 28A There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 28B There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 29A Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- 29B Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- Section V Ethics and Statistics
- Section VI Male-factor Infertility
- Section VII Genetics
- Section VIII Ovarian Stimulation
- Section IX Hormones and the Environment
- Index
- References
29A - Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
For
from Section IV - Embryology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2021
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Series page
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Limits for IVF
- Section II IVF Add-ons
- Section III The Best Policy
- Section IV Embryology
- 24A ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 24B ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 25A Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 25B Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 26A Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 26B Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 27A Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 27B Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 28A There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 28B There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 29A Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- 29B Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- Section V Ethics and Statistics
- Section VI Male-factor Infertility
- Section VII Genetics
- Section VIII Ovarian Stimulation
- Section IX Hormones and the Environment
- Index
- References
Summary
Extended culture to blastocyst is a common first-line approach to embryo selection in many IVF laboratories. Blastocyst transfer is associated with higher implantation and live birth rates than cleavage-stage embryo transfer in good prognosis patients. A blastocyst is the consequence of self-selection, having overcome morphogenetic hurdles, including activation of its own embryonic genome during early embryonic development. Improved uterine and embryonic synchronicity prevents premature exposure to the uterine environment. Blastocyst culture offers time for the gonadotrophin-induced raise in oestrogen levels to subside and enhances embryo–endometrium synchronisation with reduced uterine contractility. Evidence of epigenetic changes in blastocyst culture is weak, and babies born after blastocyst transfer have a similar chance of being healthy as those born after cleavage-stage embryo transfer. In-vivo pre-implantation embryo loss from cleavage-stage to blastocyst remains quantitatively undefined. Blastocyst culture should be routine in all IVF cycles as a strategy for selecting the most viable embryos for their implantation potential.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine , pp. 151 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021